Arguements For Gun Control Essay -- essays research papers

The violence in todays world, has become ordinary and common. This violencecauses a staggering number of deaths and injuries throughout the world. The master(prenominal)weapon used to engage in violence is the gun. Thats why I want a strict gun controlpolicy that would or so abolish guns and make the world a safer place. This policy wouldmake it impossible to buy guns and would only all(prenominal)ow hunters to rent guns. By doingthis, violence, related to guns, would greatly and promptly decrease. On April 20th, 1999, 2 friends from Columbine, Colorado came to school. They had adiabolical plan to try and kill as many people as possible. They were well prepared andhad vista out their plan carefully. Together they had 4 guns with them when theybegan their operation. It resulted in the biggest gun issue in the U.S. to date. 12students and a teacher were killed, thats not including the 2 killers who committed suicideshortly after the murders. Around 20 others were injured. This si ngle act at Columbinehigh school sparked a question in American society, is our gun control policy strongenough? I say it isnt, with all the deaths and or related to violence in our country today,its nearly nearly impossible to ignore it. I say we need a very strict gun control policy. An after diasters like Columbine, a lot of people agree with me. Unfortunately, thegovernment adept cant snap their fingers and automatically yield a gun control policy. Likeall laws and regulations, it must go through congress and if it gets through that, then it hasto be signed by the president. Many gun control policies and been proposed in congressand near havent even made it through a committee. According to the article GunControl vs. Gun Rights, on www.opensecrets.org, the government only takes bring through ongun control when a diaster occurs or when a well known figure is killed. In my eyes, thisis entirely true considering that when a normal day-by-day joe is killed, he doesnt makenation al headlines. It makes sense however, the people arent going to make a big dealout of a jest at that they dont know. Also its a known fact that when it comes to guncontrol, democrats and republicans, split right down the middle when it comes to guncontrol. Democrats favor strong restriction on guns. Republicans s focus towards gunrights and tend to hide behind the 2nd amendment. This results in gridlock (when... ...ssible considering that since the demand would go upand the supply would go way down, some people would be able to smuggle them in fromother countries from lots of money. Also I understand that the hunters in particularwouldnt be happy with this policy. I myself am not a hunter, I dont believe in killingsomething for fun. I do, however, understand that Im from an urban society and wasntraised remotely close to how most people who hunt are raised. Some hunters argue thatits a base of food but its not survival food and therefore I wouldnt let hunters keeptheir guns. I k now that Im being extremely bias, but I feel very strongly against guns andwhat they are capable of. Dont get me wrong, I know that guns have probably helped uswar most of war weve fought and saved some families from starvation but its todayworld theres just no need for them. I love to argue my point. I also love a challenge. Thats why Ive decided to debate psyche standing by his own opinion, our founding fathers, and the 2nd amendment ofthe U.S. Constitution. The actricles that Im going to rip apart, is Gun Control Isnt rough Guns, Its About Control and 43 to 1, by Mark Howerter.